graph TD
SCOPE["๐ EMS Scope<br/>Clauses 4.3 and 4.4"]
FACTORS["๐งฉ Factors to<br/>Consider"]
ISSUES["๐ Issues from 4.1<br/>and Obligations 4.2"]
BOUND["๐ Boundaries and<br/>Functions"]
CTRL["๐๏ธ Control or<br/>Influence"]
DOC["๐ Documented and<br/>Available"]
WARN["โ No Evading<br/>Accountability"]
EMS["โป๏ธ Establish EMS<br/>Clause 4.4"]
CRED["โ
Clarity and<br/>Credibility"]
SCOPE --> FACTORS
FACTORS --> ISSUES
FACTORS --> BOUND
FACTORS --> CTRL
SCOPE --> DOC
DOC --> WARN
SCOPE --> EMS
EMS --> CRED
style SCOPE fill:#4A90E2,color:#fff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style FACTORS fill:#7ED321,color:#000,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style DOC fill:#F5A623,color:#000,stroke:#333
style EMS fill:#BD10E0,color:#fff
style WARN fill:#FF6B6B,color:#fff
Flashcards
Tap a card to reveal the definition.
Key takeaways
- Clause 4.3 defines the EMS boundaries and applicability while Clause 4.4 establishes and improves the system.
- Scope must consider issues, obligations, units, boundaries, activities, products, services, and control authority.
- The EMS scope must be documented and made available to interested parties.
- Scope cannot be used to exclude inconvenient activities or evade legal and stakeholder accountability.
- A well-defined scope creates clarity for auditors and credibility for stakeholders.
Get the study kit for this course
Concept diagrams, flashcards and summaries for every lecture — I email new ones as they go live. No spam.
Continue with the full course
Hand-picked courses at this month's discount.