graph TD
IN["📥 Inputs from<br/>Clause 6"]
SA["⭐ Significant<br/>Aspects"]
CO["📋 Compliance<br/>Obligations"]
RO["⚠️ Risks and<br/>Opportunities"]
PA["🎯 Clause 6.1.4<br/>Plan Actions"]
OBJ["📈 Clause 6.2<br/>Objectives"]
SMART["✅ SMART and<br/>Measurable"]
PLAN["🗓️ Achievement<br/>Plan"]
WHO["👥 Who What<br/>and When"]
EVAL["🔍 How Results<br/>Evaluated"]
IN --> SA
IN --> CO
IN --> RO
SA --> PA
CO --> PA
RO --> PA
PA --> OBJ
OBJ --> SMART
OBJ --> PLAN
PLAN --> WHO
PLAN --> EVAL
style IN fill:#4A90E2,color:#fff,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style PA fill:#7ED321,color:#000,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
style OBJ fill:#F5A623,color:#000,stroke:#333
style PLAN fill:#BD10E0,color:#fff
style SMART fill:#50E3C2,color:#000
Flashcards
Tap a card to reveal the definition.
Key takeaways
- Objectives must flow logically from significant aspects, compliance obligations, and risks and opportunities identified in Clause 6.
- Objectives must be measurable where practicable, monitored, communicated, updated, and consistent with the environmental policy.
- Applying the SMART framework turns vague intentions into concrete, trackable environmental targets.
- Every objective needs an action plan stating what, who, when, what resources, and how results will be evaluated.
- Tying objectives back to significant aspects demonstrates a clear and defensible logical chain to auditors.
Get the study kit for this course
Concept diagrams, flashcards and summaries for every lecture — I email new ones as they go live. No spam.
Continue with the full course
Hand-picked courses at this month's discount.